Dealism is suitable for individuals and teams to quickly verify and implement.

Dealism

Core parameters and statistics

Project	Specifications
Product Name	Dealism
Category	AI Agent
Delivery form	Web/SaaS
Support Platform	Web
Supported languages	Chinese, English
Core Competencies	Inquiry management, automatic price comparison, negotiation strategy generation, terms comparison
Target users	Purchasing specialists, supplier management team
User scale	Undisclosed
Pricing Model	Freemium

Dealism is an AI tool focused on automated business negotiation and procurement price comparison, helping companies and procurement teams improve efficiency in supplier communication and price negotiation. Its core is to automate repetitive inquiry, price comparison and basic negotiation processes. In the traditional procurement process, inquiry, price comparison and negotiation of basic terms take up a lot of working time. Dealism systematizes this part of repetitive work through structured process management and AI-assisted decision-making.

User and market recognition

Procurement digitization is an important direction for enterprises to reduce costs and increase efficiency. Dealism cuts into the "negotiation" link in the procurement process - which is less covered in ERP and SRM systems but directly affects procurement costs. By digitizing and structuring negotiation strategies and experiences, Dealism provides procurement teams with a reusable methodological tool. Traditional procurement tools focus on process management (orders, invoices, contracts), while Dealism focuses on the aspects of procurement decisions that rely most on personal experience - price comparison, negotiation, and quotation evaluation.

At present, the product has not disclosed the number of users or corporate cooperation cases. The target users are mainly procurement specialists of small and medium-sized enterprises and managers who want to standardize the procurement process. For objective judgment, it is recommended to pay attention to official real-time information and industry user feedback.

Cost advantage

Traditional procurement negotiations rely on personal experience, and the training cycle for excellent procurement professionals is long and labor costs are high. Dealism standardizes the negotiation process and reduces reliance on experience.

Cost Dimension	Description
Free version	Basic inquiry management and price comparison functions
Team Edition	Subscription based on team size, includes negotiation strategy templates and reports
Enterprise Edition	Customization process, API docking and supplier database integration

For a procurement team of 5 people, tool assistance can improve the overall procurement negotiation ability, saving 3-5% of the cost of standard product procurement a year, which is a direct benefit of tens of thousands of yuan for an enterprise with a million-level procurement budget. Standardized processes also reduce experience losses caused by procurement staff turnover.

Main functions

• Inquiry Automation: Send unified inquiry requests to multiple suppliers, collect quotes and store them in a structured manner, and automatically extract key terms for comparison. The system generates standardized RFQs and sends them via email or in-system messages, and supplier responses are automatically entered through email parsing or online forms.
• Smart Price Comparison Table: Displays multi-dimensional information such as quotations, delivery dates, and payment terms of different suppliers side by side, and supports weighted scoring. Users set weights for different dimensions, and the system automatically calculates and sorts comprehensive scores, and supports exporting to Excel or PDF.
• Negotiation Strategy Suggestions: Provide target price and concession strategy suggestions based on supplier's historical quotation data, market conditions and category regular discount ranges. It is recommended to generate based on statistical analysis of historical transaction data of similar categories.
• Terms Comparison Reminder: Identify significant differences in the contract terms of different suppliers, mark potential risk items (liquidated damages ratio, difference in warranty period, etc.), and give a risk rating.
• Historical Price Tracking: Record the price changes of the same category in multiple purchases, assist in judging the rationality of the current quotation, and identify the law of price fluctuations.
• Report Generation: Automatically generate procurement price comparison reports and negotiation minutes. The report template can be customized to meet the approval process requirements of different enterprises.

Model and version evolution

Version	Date	Key Changes
Latest version	—	Intelligent price comparison, negotiation strategy suggestions, terms comparison, historical price tracking
Early version	—	Basic inquiry record management and price comparison table

The product has gone through an evolution path from procurement data management to procurement decision support. The early focus was on electronic procurement data, and the current emphasis is on data-driven analysis and recommendations. The version record shall be subject to the official release notes.

Technical advantages

• Structured price comparison engine: Unify and parse supplier quotations from different formats (emails, online forms, uploaded files) into a standardized data structure, supporting attribute-level horizontal comparisons. Provides manual auxiliary annotation input for complex quotation formats that cannot be automatically parsed, and the annotated data feeds back the analysis model training.
• Pricing analysis model: Establish price reference ranges for each category of goods based on historical transaction data and industry public quotations. Automatically mark when a supplier's quotation deviates from the range, taking into account factors such as category, specification, purchase volume, and region.
• Negotiation Strategy Library: Built-in negotiation strategy templates for common procurement categories, covering typical scenarios such as initial inquiry, volume discount negotiation, and long-term contract renewal. Strategy recommendations are generated based on statistics of past similar transaction data, rather than general words.

How to use

Entrance	How to use
Web side	Visit the official website with a browser → Create a procurement project → Add a supplier → Get a price comparison report

Typical usage process: Create a procurement project → Fill in the specifications and quantities of purchased materials → The system generates a standard inquiry template → Send to multiple suppliers → Automatically extract key fields after the quotation is sent back → Generate a multi-dimensional price comparison table → View negotiation strategy suggestions → Generate a price comparison report for internal approval → Archive transaction data. Procurement personnel's work has shifted from manually sorting out comparisons to setting parameters and reviewing recommendations.

Product Pricing

Package	Price	Contents
Free version	$0	Basic inquiry management and price comparison table functions
Team Edition	Unpublished	Unlimited Suppliers + In-depth Negotiation Strategies + Customized Reports
Enterprise Edition	Unpublished	Customization process + API docking + supplier database integration

Pricing. It is recommended to run 2-3 complete procurement projects through the free version to evaluate the effect before deciding whether to upgrade.

Application scenarios

• Daily Procurement Price Comparison: Inquiry from multiple suppliers for each purchase, and the system automatically summarizes and compares, making the high-frequency and low-complexity procurement process nearly automated.
• Supplier Evaluation: Comprehensive evaluation of supplier price competitiveness, delivery on-time rate and contract performance quality based on historical transaction data to assist hierarchical management.
• Annual Contract Negotiation: Assist in setting negotiation goals and concession bottom lines based on historical purchase volume and category price trends when renewing the annual framework agreement.
• Purchasing Audit: Provide traceable procurement decision-making basis for internal audit through historical price tracking and price comparison records.

Applicable people

• Purchasing Specialist: Reduce the workload of information collection and comparison, and focus on supplier relationship management and negotiation execution.
• Procurement Manager: Understand procurement performance through price comparison reports and historical data.
• Startup Manager: Standardized processes replace personal experience and judgment, and you can obtain professional-level procurement management tools at a low cost.
• Supply chain managers: Use data analysis capabilities to assist in formulating mid- and long-term procurement strategies.
• Not suitable for boundaries: Procurement scenarios involving complex customization solutions may not be fully covered by structured templates.

Comparison of competing products

Comparison Dimensions	Dealism	8Manage SRM	SAP Ariba	Qiqitong
Core differences	AI negotiation strategy + automatic price comparison	Full-process procurement management	Enterprise-level global procurement	China localized procurement
Price comparison ability	✅ AI automatic price comparison + weighted scoring	✅ Basic price comparison	✅ Basic price comparison	✅ Basic price comparison
Negotiation Strategy	✅ Data-Driven Strategy Advice	❌	❌	❌
Compare terms	✅ Automatically identify differences	❌	✅ Partially supported	❌
Applicable scale	Small and medium-sized teams	Medium and large enterprises	Large multinational enterprises	Medium and large enterprises
Pricing	Freemium	By Module	High (Enterprise Customization)	Medium (By Module)

Summary and Outlook

Dealism introduces AI analysis capabilities into the traditional business field of procurement negotiation, reducing information asymmetry in the procurement process through structured data management and intelligent price comparison. Its core value is to transform the negotiation process that relies on personal experience into a standardized and traceable process.

Advantages: AI negotiation strategy suggestions are the highlight of differentiation; automatic price comparison and terms comparison reduce manual operations; standardized processes reduce experience losses caused by personnel turnover.

Current limitations: The current version is effective in standardized procurement categories. Procurement scenarios that are highly customized or involve complex technical assessments still require manual professional judgment; the number of users and corporate cases are not disclosed.

Risk Disclosure:

1. Dependence on data accumulation: The accuracy of the pricing analysis model is highly dependent on the accumulation of historical transaction data. Organizations building new procurement projects may not be able to obtain sufficient strategic advice in the early stages.
2. Limitations in Category Coverage: The coverage of the negotiation strategy library depends on the category data that has been accessed by the platform. Strategy suggestions for unpopular or emerging categories may not be accurate enough.
3. Manual intervention is necessary: Dealism provides data-driven suggestions rather than automatic negotiation execution. Final decision-making and actual communication still need to be completed manually and cannot completely replace the professional judgment of purchasing personnel.
4. Competitive product substitution risk: Traditional procurement management platforms such as SAP Ariba and Qiqitong are enhancing AI capabilities. If Dealism cannot continue to deepen the AI ​​depth of vertical scenarios, it may face competitive pressure from being covered by comprehensive platform functions.

Follow-up observation points: automatic recommendation of supplier trademarks; real-time access to market conditions; more in-depth negotiation game simulation.

It is recommended that teams with procurement management needs start with the price comparison function of standard categories and verify the value of the tool through 2-3 complete projects before expanding the scope of use.

Related tools: CrewAI, langchain

Version Info

• Public beta version ：It is currently a publicly accessible version, and specific functions will be updated at a specific pace. （2026-07-14）
• earlier version ：An early trial version, the core direction is consistent with the current version. （2026-07-14）